Michael D.Heath-Caldwell M.Arch.

Michael Heath-Caldwell M.Arch
Brisbane, Queensland
ph: 0412-78-70-74
alt: m_heath_caldwell@hotmail.com

1822 - 1823 - 1824

James Heath R.A. aged 65/66
Mary Heath (ne Phillipson) aged 65/66

George Heath aged 43/44
Anne Raymond Heath (ne Dunbar) aged 35/36

Julia Anna Harrison (ne Heath) aged 15/16
John Moore Heath aged 14/15
Douglas Denon Heath aged 11/12
Dunbar Isidore Heath 7/8
Leopold G. Heath 5/6
Emma Jane Whatman   1/2

The Heath Family Engravers 1779-1878, Volume 2. James Heath A.R.A. by John Heath

The Novels of Sir Walter Scott - 17 plates engraved by Charles Heath after C.R.Leslie R.A., published by Archibald Constable, Edinburgh and Hurst Robinson (later Cadell and Whitaker) Published between 1823 and 1833 in 41 volumes. The plates were reprinted several times notably by H.G.Bohn in 1848 and 1862 as "The Book of Waverley Gems." This also includes two engravings from 'The Monatery' by James Heath (Charles Heath's father)
Waverley, Vol.I

1. - Frontispiece:Flora of the Glen.
2. - Title page - plate size 9 x 7cm - plate size 5 x 6cm
Vol.II
3. - Tile page: Holyrood.
Guy Mannering Vol.III
4. - Title page - Ellangoran Castle
The Antiquary Vol.IV.
5 - Title page: Ruins of St.Ruth.
Rob Roy Vol.V
6. - Tilte page: Ruins of Inversnaid Fort.
Vol.VI.
7. - Frontispiece: Francis Osbaldeston and Diana - plate size 10 x 7cm
Old Mortality Vols.VII and VIII.
8 - Title page: Craignathan - plate size 5 x 6cm.
9. - Bothwell Brig. -
Heart of Midlothian Vol.IX.
10 - Title page: St.Anthony's Chapel
Vol.X
11. - Interiview of Jeannie Deans.
12. - Tolbooth, Edinburgh.
Vol.XI. The Bride of Lammermoor.
13. - Crichton Castle
14. - The Ominous Incident at the Mermaiden Fountain
A Legend of Montrose Vol.XII
15. - Title page: Old Inverary - plate size 5 x 6cm.
16. - Dalgetty and Ranald - plate size 9 x 7cm.
Kenilworth Vol.XVIII
17. - "The Countess admiring..."

----------------------------------------

The Loves of the Angels (Thomas Moore) - Three plates engraved by Charles Heath after Richard Westall - published by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown. 'Engraved on steel by C.Heath: Perkins and Heath Hardened Plate.' Another edition, also dated 1823 has the same plates differently inscribed 'Engraved by C.Heath from drawings by R.Westall" i.e. presumably on copper, not on steel where much the same procedure seems to have been followed with the 'Pleasures of Hope.'
The illustrations were evidently issued separately from the text, and only few copies are known bound up together.

1. - Frontispiece: 'From a clear lamp...' - plate size 8 x 7cm.
2. - 'While thus I spoke....' - plate size 10 x 8cm.
3. - 'He saw upon the golden sand...'

----------------------------------------

Sicilian Scenery (Major Light) - Ten plates engraved by Charles Heath after P.Dewitt and Major Light. - published by Rodwell and Martin - In the European Scenery Series.
1. - Palermo - plate size 11 x 23cm
2. - Cefalu - plate size 13 x 30cm
3. - Castel Buono
4. - Alicate
5. - Santa Rosalie
6. - Capuchin Convent, Taormina
7. - Catania.
8. - Temple of Concord
9. - Capuchin Convent, Syracuse.
10 . Syracuse.

----------------------------------------

The History of Richmondshire (Whitaker) - engraved by Charles Heath after J.M.W.Turner R.A. - published by D.Appleton, New York - This work was first published between 1818 and 1823. According to Rawlinson, these two prints appeared in 1822.
1. - Kirby Lonsdale Churchyard - plate size 19 x 28cm.
2. - Ingleborough, from Hornby Castle terrace.

----------------------------------------

German Scenery (Captain Batty) - Eleven plates engraved by Charles Heath after Captain Batty - published by Rodwell and Martin. Published in 1823 in the 'European Scenery' series, with the plates dated 'June 1, 1821.'

1. - The Danube
2. - Junction of the Iller and Danube.
3. - Wasserburg.
4. - The Untersberg near Salzburg.
5. - The Danube near Linz.
6. - Linz
7. - Linz
8. - The Wallsof Vienna
9. - Baaden.
10. - The Danube near Vienna
11. - The Danube near Leopoldsburg.

----------------------------------------

The Minstrel (James Beattie) - Three plates engraved by Charles Heath after RIchard Westall R.A. - published by John Sharpe. Published '1 Jan. 1823,' but with the proof plates in the V&A collection dated 'April 27 1816.'

1. - Frontispiece: 'The wild harp rang...' - plate size 6 x 5cm.
2. - With merriment, song and timbrels clear...' - plates size 6 x 6cm.
3. - 'Responsive to the sprightly pipe...'

----------------------------------------

Pinnock's Improved Edition of Dr.Goldsmith's Abridgement of the History of Rome. - Engraved by Charles Heath - published by G. and W.B.Whittaker. Inscribed 'Hardened Steel Plate - Perkins Fairman and Heath 1821.' but 'Perkins and Heath Patent Hardened Steel Plate 1823' on the title page. Evidently an early use of steel, but not by Charles Heath.

1. - Frontispiece - Portrait of Dr.Goldsmith - plate size 14 x 8 cm.

----------------------------------------

The Social Day (Coxe) - engraved by Charles Heath - published by Carpenter and Ackermann - Although inscribed by Thomson, this print was finished by Charles Heath, as a tribute to him by Coxe witnesses. The postscript to the book's advertisement mentions that through " the kind offices of Mr.Charles Heath, at the request of Mr.Henry Corbould.. he has been enabled to publish the work this spring, which he had utterly despaired of, without omitting the plate in question.' 'Published July 1, 1823.'

1. - The Carpet Dance - plate size 22 x 15cm.

----------------------------------------

Separate print - Wrexham Church in the County of Denbigh: Mrs Mary Myddleton's Monument by Roubilliac. - engraved by Charles Heath after H.Billinge - plate size 45 x 27cm - published by H.Billings, Wrexham

----------------------------------------

Separate print - 'The Girl at the Well.' - plate size 30 x 23cm - engraved by Charles Heath after Richard Westall R.A. - published by Hurst Robinson.

----------------------------------------

Separate print - 'A Gentleman of the Court of King Charles the First.' - engraved by Charles Heath after Sir. A. van Dyck - plate size 26 x 21cm - published by Hurst Robinson - 'Published for the Select Work of Engravings by William Buchanan...' 1st October 1823.'

----------------------------------------

Separate print - "View of Thames from Richmond Hill - plate size 44 x 61cm - engraved by Charles Heath after T.C.Mofland - published by Hurst, Robinson - possibly a companion engraving to 1822.

Thursday 2 January 1823
Leeds Intelligencer

Splendid and Scarce Books
A List of Valuable Books, Ancient and Modern.
In Fine Arts, Antiquities, History, Biography, Voyages, Travels, &c.
Being a selection from the stock of Robinson and Hernaman, Booksellers, Leeds, now on sale, at the affixed prices. - - -
Quarto - - -
Shakespeare's Dramatic Works, from the Text of Johnson and Streven. Heath's beautiful Edition, embellished with Boydell's and Harding's Plates, superbly bound in Morocco, by Herring, 6 Vols. £30 v- - - -

Thursday 2 January 1823
Morning Chronicle

Sales and Auctions

Select Prints and Books of Prints - By Mr.George Jones, at his Spacious Rooms, Leicester Street, Leicester Square, on Monday, the 20th inst. and Fourteen following Evenings (Saturdays and Sundays excepted) at Six o'clock, by order of the Executors, and without any reservation.

The whole of the remaining valuable and expensive Stock of the late Mr.A. Molteno of Pall Mall, deceased, consisting of numerous very fine and rare British portraits, English and foreign topographical prints and drawings, choice specimens of the early Italian and German masters, M.Schoen, Israel van Meck, M.Zagil, A.Durer, L.van Loyden, &c. capital - - - a numerous collection of portraits, historical, and fancy subjects after Sir. J.Reynolds mostly proofs; the most esteemed works of Woollett, Strange, Hogarth, Sharp, Heath, Earlom, Raimbach, Bartolozzi &c. including the Marlborough gems, - - continues - - -

Saturday 4 January 1823
Globe

In a few days will be published,
Illustrations of The Loves of the Angels, from designs by R.Westall Esq., engraved by Mr.Charles Heath, in 8vo. price 5s. A few Proofs will be taken off.

Saturday 4 January 1823
Northampton Mercury

New and important Works, published by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown, London.

1. The Loves of The Angels. A poem by Thomas Moore. In 8vo. 9s. Boards, 4th Edition.
2. - Illustrations of Mr.Moore's "Loes of the Angels." From Designs by R.Westall Esq., engraved by Mr.Charles Heath, in 8vo. Price 5s.
3. - Memoirs of Mary Queen of Scots, with Anecdotes of the Court of Henry the Second, during her Residence in France. By Miss Benge. In 2 Vols. 8vo. with a genuine Portrait never before engraved. £1.4s Boards.
continues - - - long list.

Saturday 4 January 1823
Commercial Chronicle (London)

Insolvent Debtors' Court.
Friday, January 2
William Gamble, a Norfolk farmer, was opposed by Mr.Heath on behalf of the Rev.William Davis Plaistow, his landlord.

Mr.Jarvis, Mr.Plaistow's attorney, was examined, and stated that in December 1821, it was agreed between Mr.Plaistow and the Insolvent, that the former should not put in a distress for something more than a year's rent, which was then due, and that the latter should not remove any of his stock. Mr.Plaistow put in a distress on the 2nd of July, under which he sold and received upwards of 800/.
The insolvent, on his examination, stated that he held the farm from Mr.Plaistow, at a rent of 907/. a-year,and had expended all his property in draining and improving it. He paid his rent punctually down to the last quarter of 1820, when he left a balance unpaid.

The farm, since the Insolvent left it, notwithstanding all the money he expended on it, has been let by Mr.Plaistow at 400/. a year. At Midsummer, he (the Insolvent) sold a part of his stock and furniture, valued together at 150/. to his brother-in-law, who took that sum in payment of 300/. he had lent the Insolvent, to enable him to pay Mr.Plaistow his rent. He sold his sheep at the same time for 340/., 160/. of which he applied to the payment of taxes, to which the landlord was liable, and of labourer's wages; and with the remainder he paid his tradespeople ten shillings in the pound on their respective debts.

Mr.Pollock addressed the Court for the Insolvent. When a landlord, he said, pursued a tenant to the utmost extremity of the law for the balance of a rent of 907/. a year, which it was evident had long been paid for a farm not worth more than 400/. a year; such a proceeding was not very creditable to the landlord.

The ground of Mr.Plaistow's complaint was, that he was not allowed to sweep away every particle of the Insolvent's property, leaving nothing for any other creditor - not even for Insolvent's brother-in-law, who had lent his money to enable him to pay Mr.Plaistow his exorbitant rent; and who, in common with the other creditors to whom the Insolvent had made payments, received but ten shillings in the pound. It was evident that the Insolvent might have disposed of much more of his property before Mr.Plaistow put in his distress, had it not been his wish to leave Mr.Plaistow all that he could, with any feeling of justice for his other creditors, consider him entitled to. - - -
When the Court was about to pronounce its judgment, it was observed that the affidavits of the service of notice on the insolvent's creditors, though regularly made, were not filed, to give time for which the case was adjourned.

---------------

John Lomas, a farmer from Lincolnshire, was opposed by Mr.Heath, on behalf of Dr.Wordsworth, the rector of the parish in which the insolvent lived, for a debt due for tithes.

It appeared by the insolvent's examination, that he gave a warrant of attorney to his brothers, for 900/. he had borrowed from them in the course of sixteen years, of which they had only kept an account on bits of paper which were all destroyed when the warrant of attorney was given. The insolvent said, it was his intention, when he gave the warrant of attorney, that his brothers should divide the produce equally amongst all his creditors; instead of which, they sold every thing he had in the world, and kept all for themselves.

Mr.Pollock, who was Counsel for the insolvent, contended that the misconduct of the insolvent's brothers should not be visited upon him.
The Court said, it was quite impossible to give credit to the insolvent's account, either of his debt to his brothers or of his intention in giving them the warrant of attorney; it was evidently given to defraud his creditors. The judgment of the Court was, that he should be remanded for ten months.

Sunday 5 January 1823
British Luminary

History for Schools - Just Published, price 5s. 6d.
Also (brought down to the King's Visit to Ireland, with a Portrait of Dr.Goldsmith, engraved by Heath),
Pinnock's improved Edition of Goldsmith's History of England, on the same approved plan. Seventeenth Edition - 12mo. price 6s. bound.
"We notice this new edition of a valuable Work, because we consider it to be one of the most complete books of the kind for education that have ever issued from the press, and the improvements so copious as to merit a distinct eulogism. The Editors deserve every praise for the pains and labour they have bestowed in perfecting the publication, and we feel confident that the sixteenth will be followed more rapidly than it has been preceded, by many other Editors." Lit. Gaz. No.187

Printed for G. and W.B.Whittaer, Ave Maira Lane, London

Monday 6 January 1823
Salisbury and Winchester Journal

New Editions of Pinnock's Catechisms.
Just published, price 9d. accurately printed, and uniform with the rest of the series.
The Catechism of Greek Grammar, and the Catechism of Hebrew Grammar; also the following Catechisms just reprinted viz. - - - (long list)

The decided superiority of these excellent Juvenile Works over all others has ensured to them a most extensive and universal sale, which has enabled the publishers to ornament the new editions with beautiful Portraits, engraved on hardened steel, by Heath and Co. by which they trust they have in some measure augmented their value without increasing the price. - - -

Printed for G. and W.B.Whittaker, Ave Maria Lane, London: - and sold by Messrs. Brodie and Dowding, Salisbury, and E.Skelton and Co. Southampton

Tuesday 7 January 1823
Star (London)

Insolvent Debtors' Court, January 6.
John Stephen Racine, who kept the Green Dragon, at South Mimms, was opposed by Mr.Pollock, on behalf of a creditor named Williamson.

The grounds of opposition were, a fraudulent preference to creditor named Pitham, by giving him a warrant of attorney, and also by putting Mr.Williamson to an unnecessary expense, by pleading a dilatory and vexatious plea to an action brought by him against the insolvent.

It appeared, that at the time the insolvent took the public-house, the landlords, who were brewers, refused to allow any sums of money to be received by the outgoing tenant as goodwill for the house. In order to evade this refusal, Mr.Williamson, who was the outgoing tenant, through the medium of a broker, named Harris, got his money for goodwill thus: - - -

Mr.Pollock addressed the Court for the opposing creditor, and Mr.Heath for the Insolvent; after which the Court adjourned the case, for the Insolvent to produce Pitham before the Court.

William Richards, who had been before the Court several times before, upon the last of which days he was directed to be detained in custody for twelve months, for fraudulent conduct towards his creditors, appeared today, at the instance of his assignees, to have his case reheard. The object of the case was to increase the insolvent's punishment, it having been discovered, since the last hearing, that a quantity of gold watches, chains, jewellery of all descriptions, a deal of very valuable household furniture, wearing apparel, crapes, veils, expensive ladies' dresses, table linens, &c. had been fraudulently concealed by the insolvent from his creditors.

Mr.Heath and Mr.Cooke now appeared for the creditors, and Mr.Pollock was for the insolvent. Nine witnesses were examined to prove the concealment; their evidence went to show a premeditated system of concealment carried on, in which the wife of the insolvent was chief mover, assisted by a Mr. and Mrs.Hart, of Mile-End; a Mr. and Mrs.Ray of Stepney; - - - Mr.Heath said he should take a few days to advise with his clients upon the subject.

Thursday 9 January 1823
Morning Herald (London)

Campbell's Poetical Works.
This day is published, in foolscap 8vo. (a new edition, illustrated by Engravings from Designs by R.Westall R.A.) price 6s. boards of "The Pleasures of Hope, wth other Poems.
By Thomas Campbell - Printed for Longmans, Hurst, Orme,and Brown, London; and Stirling and Slade, Edinburgh.

Of whom may be had, by the same Author.
Gertrude of Wyoming, or the Pennsylvanian Cottage, and other Poems. In foolscap 8vo., the seveth edition, with Engravings by C.Heath from Designs by Westall, 9s. boards.
The plates may be had separate to illustrate the former edition of these works. The Pleasures of Hope, 9s. quarto,and 5s. foolscap 8vo. - Gertrude of Wyoming, 7s. quarto and 4s. foolscap 8vo.

Thursday 9 January 1823
Commercial Chronicle (London)

Insolvent Debtors' Court
Wed. Jan.6

William Code came up to be heard on his petition to be discharge, and was opposed by Mr.Pollock, on behalf of a creditor named Ellingford, who deposed that in the month of September 1821 he gave the insolvent an acceptance of Sir John Alderson and Co's., at two month's date, for £129/. to get discounted, and that the insolvent gave him but £59/. and kept the remainder.

On his cross-examination, Ellingford admitted that he had been the insolvent's servant, and that about four years ago he became a keeper of marine stores,, and has since been frequently in trouble, on all of which occasions the insolvent had been his bail, and that he had bailed him the month after he had kept the money out of Sir John Alderson's acceptance. - - -

The insolvent was examined by his Counsel, Mr.Heath, in explanation, and stated that he had before procured bills to be discounted for Ellingford, and paid him the money as he had occasion for it, and intended to do so in the last instance, but was prevented by his disappointments. In the year 1821 when he allowed Davy to remove his furniture, he acted so far under his advice, which was also to take the benefit of the Insolvent Act, but that he refused to do, and endeavoured to settle with his creditors by giving every thing up to them. Failing in his endeavours and being arrested last November, he put all the property he had in the world in his schedule for the benefit of all his creditors.

The Court said it was evident there was impurity on both sides. - - The judgment of the Court was that the insolvent should be remanded for six months from the date of filing his petition.

Monday 13 January 1823
British Press
Insolvent Debtors' Court.
Saturday, January 11.

Charles William Auber was opposed by Mr.Heath for several creditors. The insolvent had been a pawnbroker, in Tottenham Court Road, which place he left in the latter end of 1821, being then in debt 1,800/., 1,100/. of which were due to his father and brother. In the beginning of February 1822, he opened a shop in Holborn, as a silversmith and was arrested in the month of June, at the suit of Mr.Rousel, his detaining creditor, and remained four weeks in prison, when he bailed out, and returned home; but, in the beginning of his goods were distrained for rent - - -

Mr.Cook, silversmith, Jerwin Street, stated that while the insolvent was in prison in June, he called at his house, and was told that the insolvent was in the country for the benefit of his health; and not doubting the truth of the account, gave the insolvent credit for 5/.'s worth of goods after, which he should not have done had he known he was in prison.

Mr.Heath addressed he Court in aggravation, contending there could be no security for traders, if a person, so wholly insolvent as to be supporting himself by pawning the goods out of his shop, and even going to prison for a debt which he could not pay, was allowed to conceal his situation from the persons with whom he dealt, and continue to take their goods on credit, as if he were a solvent man. - - -

The Court said it was impossible not to see that the insolvent had contracted debts when he could have no reasonable expectation of being able to pay; and it would be equally impossible for the credit so necessary to the carrying on of trade to exist if such persons were to come to that Court and be discharged immediately from debts so contracted. It was in consideration of the insolvent's family and his apparent state of health, that the Court were so lenient as to adjudge that he should be remanded for eight months, for contracting debts without reasonable expectation.

Monday 13 January 1823
Bell's Weekly Messenger

Insolvent Debtors' Court
On Wednesday William Coole came up to be heard on his petition to be discharged, and was opposed by Mr.Pollock, on behalf of a creditor, named Ellingford: he was supported by Mr.Heath.

Ellingford stated that in the month of September 1821, he gave the insolvent an acceptance of Sir John Alderson and Co.'s, at two months date for 129/. to get discounted for him, and that the insolvent gave him but 59/. out of it, and kept the remainder.

On cross-examination, the witness stated that he had been the insolvent's servant. About four years ago he became a dealer in marine stores, and had since been frequently in trouble, on all of which occasions he had been bailed by the insolvent, who had bailed him the last time the month after he had kept the money out of Sir John Alderson's acceptance. - - -

The insolvent was examined by Mr.Heath in explanation, and stated that he had, before his last bill transaction with Ellingford, procured bills to be discounted for him, and had paid him the money, as he (Elllingford) had occasion for it, and meant to do so in the last instance, but was prevented by his disappointments. - - -

The Court said it was evident there was impurity on both sides. In the case of the particular fraud complained of by Ellingford, when a creditor sought to establish a fraud against an insolvent at the time of contracting a debt, the Court must always take into consideration how the transaction was viewed by the creditor himself at the time the insolvent's conduct became first known to him; and in this case it appeared that the creditor, so far from accusing the insolvent of having acted fraudulently, continued to live with him on terms of friendship, and had been bailed the month after. - - - the Court considered him a very proper person on whom to exercise the discretionary power vested in it by the 16th section of the Act, and was only sorry it could not include the broker, who was perhaps the more guilty person, in the same punishment. The judgment of the Court was, that the insolvent should be remanded for six months from the date of filing his petition.

Wednesday 15 January 1823
Globe

New Works published by Hurst, Robinson, and Co. Booksellers to the King, 90 Cheapside, and S.Pall Mall.
18. Don Quixote de la Mancha. Embellished with 24 Engravings by Charles Heath, from Drawings by Richard Westall R.A. A new Edition. In 4 vols. Foolscap 8vo. Price 2/. 2s. from the work, royal 4to. on India paper 2/.12s.6d.

Wednesday 15 January 1823
Morning Chronicle

Ancient and Modern Prints. - By Mr.Sotheby, at his House, Wellington Street, Strand, on Monday next, and following Day, at Twelve.

A Choice Selection of Engravings, consisting of Beautiful Proofs and First Impression, by the most esteemed modern Artists, viz.: - Woollett, Sharp, James Heath, Wills, Earlom, Browne, R.Morghen, Raimbach, Scott, Holloway, Bervic, Balechou, &c. &c. including a very brilliant Impression of the Diploma of the Royal Academy, and Proofs of the Clytie, &c., by Bartolozzi; Subscription Proof of the Kemble Family, Illustrations of the popular Works of the most celebrated living Authors, after Westall, Stothard, Allan, Leslie, &c. by Charles Heath, Engleheart, Warren &c. - - -

Tuesday 18 January 1825
George Heath's Almanacs. Records of the Heath Family, Vol.1

To London. Overturned.

Sunday 19 January 1823
John Bull

The following are in the press, and will be published in the course of the present and early in the ensuing month, by G. and W.B.Whittaker, Ave.Maria Lane - - -
12. Sturm's Reflections, on the Works of God: and of his Providence throughout all Nature. Translated from the German by the Rev.Dr.Balfour. With elegant Engravings by Charles Heath, from Designs by H.Corbould. In 2 vols. Foolscap. Proof Impressions of the Illustrations on India Paper, ropal 4to. separate.

Monday 20 January 1823
John Bull

The following important Works will be published by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, Paternoster-Row, in the course of January.
The History of Roman Literature, from the earliest Periods to the Augustan Age. By John Dunlop. In 2 vols.8vo.
2. Illustrations "The Loves of the Angles." from designs by R.Westall Esq.; engraved by Mr.Charles Heath, in 8vo. price 5s. A few Proofs will be taken off.
- - - -

Thursday 23 January 1823
The Heath Family Engravers 1779-1878, Volume 3. by John Heath

Letter James Heath to Cadell & Davies.

I am anxious to settle my account with you for the 2 set of Parris [?] but the rest of the bill, I know nothing about.

Let me know exactly how we stand and I will either call or send.

I am, yours etc.
J.Heath

Thursday 23 January 1823
Leeds Intelligencer

Illustrations of the Works of the Author of Waverley.
Published by Hurst, Robinson, and Co. London; and A.Constable and Co. Edinbro'.

Illustrations of Kenilworth, in 7 Prints. After Designs by C.R.Leslie. Engraved by Heath, Engleheart, Romney, &c. 8vo. 16s. Proof 4, to. £1.4s. On India Paper, £1.10s.
Illustrations from Drawings by R.Westall R.A. Engraved by Charles Heath, of Ivanhoe, in 7 Prints, 8vo. 16s. Proofs 4to. £1.5s. On India Paper, £1.1.0s.

Thursday 23 January 1823
Insolvent Debtors' Court.
Wednesday, January 22.
The Metropolitan Society for the Opposition and Prosecution of Fraudulent Insolvent Debtors, versus Jackson

John Hough Jackson, a young man of genteel appearance, was opposed by Mr.Heath, standing Counsel to the above Society, on behalf of Messrs. Barnard, Hollier, and Co. This being the first opposition on the part of the Metropolitan Society, considerable interest was excited, and the hearing of the case occupied a several hours.

The insolvent, who had just attained the age of 23, had been for some time in partnership with a Mr.Woodstock, or Woodcock, who was to have brought 1,000/. into the concern; but he only obtained of him 870/. by indirect means, through the interference of a Mr.Notley, who procured it of Mr.Goodwin, on the security of Woodcock; but he (insolvent) believed it had never been refunded to Mr.G.

The partnership entered into, was that of coal-merchants, and the business was carried on in Cannon Street. In the month of February or March the insolvent left London and went to Sheriff Hill, near Newcastle-upon-Tyne, in quest of some property, to which he considered himself entitled by the death of an uncle; but, on inquiry, he found that bequests had been made by will; yet it turned out that he died in embarrassed circumstance. - - - On being very rigidly pressed on this head, he said he purchased some regular bill-books and a journal in May 1820, but scarcely made an entries in them. His previous entries, viz. from the preceding August, being made in an old book of his father's, and from which book the journal delivered into Court was compiled, but not as was suspected written at the same time.

Mr.Heath was desirous to know to what book the red ink figures in the book produced referred?

The insolvent replied that it was a reference to the pages of the book from whence he took the copy; but although full account of the coals he had disposed of while carrying on business in Cannon Street, London.

Mr.Heath then informed him that the contrary would be proved by the carman who delivered them, and who was subpoenaed as a witness.

The insolvent, when called on to explain particulars relative to certain deliveries, replied in a very equivocal manner; and on being further interrogated relative to his book, he admitted with reluctance that it was partly made up in the King's Bench prison.

Mr.Heath - "This is what we had suspected all along."

The insolvent then explained. He wished to have given up the books precisely as they were when he went into custody, however irregular the accounts they contained might be, but had been advised to pursue the course he had adopted. The real fact was, that the documents he had delivered in were formed from heterogenous sources - such as Mrs.Ramsey's accounts, cartage accounts, little memorandums, recollections, &c. &c. To prove his desire to give an explicit account of his affairs, he had accounted for coals received by water, to which the carman's tickets had no reference, and therefore beyond the sagacity of his opposing creditors to discover, but on investigation these items formed a very inconsiderable part of his statement.

Mr.Heath observed, that the carman would prove a defalcation in his account of 150 chaldrons of coals.

Mr.Pollock, who was retained by the insolvent advised him to pray an adjournment, and to make an effort to produce the original book and documents, but receiving no assent, the examination in chief proceeded. He admitted, that notwithstanding appearances were against his statement, from the similarity of the ink, the entries were not made at the same time.

Mr.Pollock interrogated the petitioner at considerable length, but eliciting nothing of importance to the interest of his client. Among other things he admitted he owed his opposing creditors 111/. to whom Mr.Notely, whose name had been mentioned, was, during his minority, a guarantee, but he considered that that gentleman was now disposed to do him injury.

Mr.Woodcock was then called by Mr.Heath. - Witness stated that he had seen a variety of books of account in the custody of the insolvent; the description of which he gave with great precision, but professed not to know the nature of the recent entries they contained.

Mr.Heath, in an address of unusual length, implored the Court to mark the case that had just been investigated as one of extraordinary fraud; for never did he (Mr.H) know a more barefaced attempt to impose on the Court, for all real documents were withheld, and those which were produced were base fabrications and put in in their stead. The Learned Gentleman had no doubt but the Court would, by the judgment it would pronounce, inform the insolvent and his sagacious adviser, that in that Court imposition was detected, and never went unpunished.

The Chief Commissioner in pronouncing judgment observed that, the Court was always happy (as on the present occasion) to receive the valuable assistance of gentlemen of the bar, to whom the conflicting interests of opposing creditors on the one hand, and of insolvents on the other, were confided. - - - but under all the circumstances its judgment was, that he be remanded at the suit of his opposing creditors for the space of eighteen months for fraudulently concealing his books.

Mr. Commissioner Harris perfectly concurred in the judgment delivered, and observed that he hoped it would so operate on the public mind, that if the present was the first it would be the last and only case where so much fraud had been used and imposture detected.

Thursday 30 January 1823
Commercial Chronicle (London)

Insolvent Debtors' Court, January 29.

Mr.White was opposed by Mr.Heath on behalf of Mrs.Stott and Mr.Rotheram.
It appeared the insolvent, who was a genteel-looking young Scotchman, left Edinburgh some time since, he having been previously sequestrated for the sum of 10,400/., but denied that he has taken the benefit of the Cessio Bonorum Act for relief of insolvents in Scotland. Since his failure in Scotland he had contrived to contract debts to a considerable amount, and then came on a venture to London with five pounds in his pocket, in oder to obtain some agencies. - - - During his sojourning here, and living at the expense of his unsuspecting hostess, he managed to get 15/. worth of clothes from Mr.Rotheram, on ready money terms. The order was executed but when the last garment was sent to his lodgings complete, the bird was flown to Brighton, wither Mr.R. sent a messenger called "John Doe" by whose influence he was brought to London.

Mr.Heath addressed the Court in aggravation, during which the insolvent appeared extremely careless of the result of the investigation. He wished to interrupt and make one observation, viz. that Mrs.Stott had received a bill for debt from a tradesman in Holdborn.

Mr.Heath conferred with his client and it turned out that the tradesman departed for Scotland ten days after he accepted the three months bill.

The Court felt considerable satisfaction that Mr.Rotheram had acted in the prompt manner he had in arresting the insolvent in his career, for it was evident that he would have pursued the plan at Brighton he had so successfully adopted in London. The insolvent had been released in Scotland from debts to the amount of 10,000/. and upwards, after which he contracts others to a great amount, and at last comes to London with scarcely money sufficient to pay his freightage, to attempt new experiments, the last of which was to come to that Court, and ask for instant relief.

The Court would grant no such boon to such an insolvent, but adjudged him to be confined for six months from the date of his petition.

Friday 31 January 1823
Evening Mail.

Insolvent Debtors' Court.
Justice Hall, Old Bailey, Jan. 29

Mr.Edward Quin, partner with Dr.Stoddart in the paper called the New Times, came up on his petition, to take the benefit of the Act for the Relief of Insolvent Debtors.
The officer of the Court having made the usual inquiry, whether anyone appeared to oppose the insolvent. -
Mr.Adams stated, that he was prepared to oppose him, on the part of a creditor, for a debt which had not been inserted in the insolvent's schedule.

Mr.Heath, who appeared for the insolvent, asked what was the amount of the debt?

Mr.Adams - It is £13/.18s.

Mr.Heath - Then prove your debt.

Mr.Adams - The creditor is here, and will prove it immediately.

Mr.Pollock - I appear in this case on behalf of Dr.Stoddart. The proper officer then called over the names of Messrs. Rimmer, Henson, Bonsor, Docksey, and Mrs.Mary-Anne Lawson, five of the insolvent's creditors, but none of them answered.

The opposing creditor having been sworn, was examined by Mr.Adams as follows:-

Were you in the employ of Mr.Quinn in the year 1819? - No Sir, not in his employment.

I do not mean as his servant; but were you in the habit of procuring information for him? - Yes, I was.

On what terms? - for 6/.19s. per quarter.

Is he indebted to you for two quarters' intelligence? - Yes, for the quarters ending the 30th September and the 31st of December 1819.

Mr.Heath - Have you any other account against him? - None.

Mr.Heath - (to the insolvent) - When did you leave the Traveller newspaper? - In the month of March 1919, I think.

Mr.Adams - Did your interest in theTraveller cease at that time? - No, it did not.

Mr.Heath - Did you continue to manage that concern? -No, I ceased at that time to be editor of the Traveller.

Mr.Adams - Did you not continue responsible for the quarter ending in Dec.1819? - I left the country in March, 1819; and should not, of course,, contract a debt at a subsequent period.

Mr.Adams - That is a legal question which we are not called upon to argue. Did you give up your interest in The Traveller when you left the country in March? - No, not until the following December.

Did you give my client notice, that his services were no longer wanted? - No, I did not.
But you are still a proprietor? -

Here Mr.Heath tendered the amount of the debt.

Mr.Adams said, he was so young in the forms of that Court, and the mode of conducting an opposition, that he knew not whether the proposition of his learned friend was regular.

Mr.Heath - I offer the amount of the debt. You can ask no more.

Mr.Adams - I am the most fortunate man in the world; I have recovered two debts, without any difficulty.

Mr.Reynolds - O, yes, there were a debt and costs, amounting to £99/. paid last night for the purpose of preventing opposition.

Mr.Heath - And since that, this new debt has been hunted out.

Mr.Adams - Certainly not.

The Chief Commissioner - Well, there is an end to Mr.Adam's opposition.

Mr.Joseph Bonsor and Mr.J.Docksey were then appointed assignees.

Shortly afterwards, Mr.Heath moved that the case should be adjourned generally, which was ordered.

On looking over the schedule of the insolvent's debts, it appeared that they amounted to £16,000/. his assets to 800/. The two opposing creditors obtained their full demands. Among the debts is one to the Stamp-Office for £2,500/.

Saturday 1 February 1823
Charles Heath, 69 Fleet Street, London - to Dawson Turner.

My dear Sir,
I have received your very kind and welcome letter and beg to thank you for your good offices in this, as I feel confident that it is to your interest we are indebted for this order.

I shall feel much obliged by a cancelled note by return of Post that we may see the proper size and quantity of writing and present arrangement of the Note, on the reverse of which two Specimens shall be made up and then you can suggest such alterations as may be deemed necessary.

Mr.Perkins desires me to state that he has invented a mode by which the present robbery of the marks of Bankers parcels may be put an end to. He wishes to know your opinion. That is, whether if he can accomplish such a desirable thing it would be worth the different Bankers to pay either a premium or annual sum. He is taking out a patent for it and thinks it infallible. The object is to make it not worth robbers while to touch the Notes although he knew they were in the coach and could get them. Your opinion on this subject will much oblige me.

With best respects to yourself and Family. Believe me, Dear Sir,
Yours most truly obliged.
Charles Heath

1824 circa
The Heath Family Engravers 1779-1878, Volume 3. by John Heath

Letter from Charles Heath

Dear Sir,
The last Plate will be done I hope by tomorrow evening. It has been a most troublesome concern as half the Plate was taken quite out and the joining the new to the other work takes almost as much time as to do the whole again.

This is all Mr.O.'s [Owen's] fault, as nothing can be more unlike his own two drawings. I shall most like come myself on Saturday.

Yours very truly,
Charles Heath

Friday 7 February 1823
Morning Herald (London)

Just published, in 2 vols. royal 18mo. price 18s. boards.

Sturm's Reflections; illustrated by elegant engravings by C.Heath from the Designs of H.Corbould.
Printed for G. and W.B.Whitaker,Ave Maria Lane.

Also the Illustrations to the above, separate. Proofs on India Paper, royal 4to. price 16s.

Saturday 8 February 1823
New Times (London)

Insolvent Debtors' Court, Feb 7.
Extensive Fraud

William Angus was opposed by Mr.Adolphus and Mr.Pollock, on behalf of Mr.Jordan, an extensive merchant at Liverpool, with whom the insolvent had lived as clerk for 20 years, at a progressive salary. Every confidence was placed in him, and it was his business to pay and receive money on account of his employer. - - -

The insolvent stated that he was entirely at a loss to state how or by what means he had disposed of the money, but he admitted the deficiency to the full extent, barring about £1000/. salary and money paid which would liquidate it. He lamented the error into which he had fallen and which must have arisen from a want of caution in not taking sufficient care of the drawers where money was deposited, and trusting too much to a junior clerk who had died since he (insolvent) had been in custody.

The Commissioners said they could not entertain such a petition and schedule; the hearing must therefore be adjourned in order that the insolvent might file an account of what had become of this property; and it was a mercy to him that they did not dismiss the petition at once.

Mr.Heath said the petitioner had admitted the defalcation, and was ready to receive the judgment of the Court.

The Chief Commissioner observed, that if such a course were adopted, it would only be necessary for insolvents to get involved in debt, and then come before the Court without any account, and pray for its judgment, and then go back to prison and spend the money.

The Order of the Court was, that the case be adjourned generally, and the insolvent to give 14 days notice to the opposing creditor.

Monday 10 February 1823
British Press

Insolvent Debtors' Court.
Abraham Phillips, a sprightly young Israelite, applied for his discharge, which was opposed by Messrs.Pollock, Adolphus and Cooke, on behalf of a variety of opposing creditors.

It appeared that the insolvent had been a hardwareman and general dealer at Birmingham, where he had carried on business for about four years. The means by which he obtained credit was, a representation that his sister, who was lately married, received a fortune of 500/. and that his father had advanced him a like sum to further his prospects in the world. Although Mr.Cutler, one of the opposing creditors, declared such statement was made, the insolvent at first completely denied it.

The insolvent said, that a proposal was made by the parents of a young Jewess, that he should enter into a matrimonial transaction, and the preliminary documents were prepared conformable with the custom of the Hebrews: this happened about the month of May last, since which time it appeared that he had contracted debts to the amount of between £500/. and £600/. He denied most solemnly that the marriage contract was broken off through a representation of his being in insolvent circumstances.

Mr.Pollock wished much to know what the insolvent had done with the 600/. which he had gathered from his creditors in the short space of four months.

He could not, however, render any further account, except that he had paid sundry bills, but having kept no bill-book he was unable to specify particulars. After being repeatedly pressed as to his conversation with Mrs.Wolfe, the mother of his intended bride, he still denied having used the language as represented to Counsel. - - -

After several witnesses (creditors) has been examined.

Deborah Wolfe was called by Mr.Cooke, who attempted to ask the witness relative to the particular interrogatory of Mr.Adolphus to the insolvent.

Mr.Heath interposed - He contended that a witness was not to be led, and the precise words of particular conversation put into her mouth. It was, in his opinion, contrary to the rules of evidence so ably laid down by Lord Ellenborough.

Mr.Adolphus was heard at considerable length on the other side.

Mr.Heath contended again, that the insolvent did not stand there in the ordinary capacity of a witness, but as a petitioner on his examination.

The Chief Commissioner said, after a conference with his learned brothers, that the insolvent was a party as well as a witness. A petitioner who came there was a witness for and against himself; therefore we think you may put the question to Mrs.Wolfe in the precise words in which Mr.Pollock put it to the insolvent. - - -

The Chief Commissioner observed, that there was no doubt but a complete case of fraud was made out, and a more extensive one contemplated. The judgment of the Court was, that he be remanded for ten months, to be confined within the walls of the King's Bench prison, and for that period deprived of the rules and day rules.

Wednesday 12 February 1823

My dear Sir,
I have the pleasure of sending with this three Notes made up for your inspection. Any alteration or other combination from those or any other Notes you have can be done. I likewise send two small sheets of Borders any of which, one excepted and which is marked, you can have. Likewise a tint composed of small writing on a ground for the other writing to be engrave on.

No.1. I think would make a very handsome Note and the middle ground has never been used for any other Bank.

No.2. would be very handsome, either of the ornaments at the ends of the middle ground can be chosen.

No.3. is I think simple and elegant, and if your Notes are not liable to have the Borders cut off would be very secure. A View of Yarmouth may be substituted for a view of Chepstow.

Any improvements your own taste may suggest shall be punctually attended to. Indeed it would be more satisfactory if you would make one up as it is almost impossible in matters of this sort to please another persons ideas.

I send a parcel from Mr.Hammerton [Hamilton?] containing some letters and Proofs which we beg your acceptance of. I am very anxious to have our paper circulating in Yarmouth.

With best respects, I remain Dear Sir, Truly yours.
Charles Heath

Saturday 15 February 1823
Saint James's Chronicle

Just Published, In Two Vols. royal 18mo. price 18s. boards
Sturm's Reflections; illustrated by elegant Engravings by C.Heath from the Designs of H.Corbauld.
Also, The Illustrations to the above, separate. Proofs on India Paper, royal 4to. price 16s.

Monday 17 February 1823
John Bull

Insolvent Debtors' Court
Tuesday. - John Baylie was opposed on behalf of the Overseers and Churchwardens of the parish of St.Dunstan in the West. The insolvent had been employed as collector of the poor-rates of the said parish for three or four years commencing from October 1819. He had also been collector for the Liberty of the Rolls, but of which Liberty, as collector, he did not know how the balance stood. The insolvent was a defaulter to the amount of between 5 and 600/. but he stated it to be but 420/.

Mr.Heath argued that this case did not come within the spirit of the Act: for the insolvent could not be considered as in the light of a servant, as the security was still liable to be called upon. The party had also imprisoned the insolvent criminally, under an alderman's warrant, which was lodged against him whilst in prison, where he had been confined since 1822, and that they had consequently made their election.

The Court in pronouncing judgment observed that, it was too much to say that a person having a floating balance in their hands, was not to be answerable for such balance when called upon; nor was it any plea to say that a multiplicity of business prevented his making up his accounts; that there was no excuse against legal misconduct; and that the insolvent came within the meaning of the 18th section. - - - The judgment of the Court therefore was, that the insolvent should not be discharged out of custody until he should have been imprisoned for a period not exceeding three months, to be computed from the date of filing his petition.

Wednesday 19 February 1823
Public Ledger and Daily Advertiser

Police
Bow-Street
Yesterday Samuel Dutcher, a man of colour, was brought before Sir R.Birnie and Thomas Halls, Esq. charged with stealing £205 in Bank-notes, the property of his employers, Messrs. Perkins, Heath, and Heath, engravers, 69 Fleet Street.
It appeared in evidence, that Messrs. Perkins and Heaths brought the prisoner with them to this country, from America, some years ago, and continued him in their service up to the time of the robbery in question. They had so high an opinion of his integrity, that, although his situation was the humble one of porter, he was frequently entrusted to pay and receive large sums of money. On the 31st of January last, Mr.Bacon, the managing clerk of Messrs.Perkins and Heaths, sent the prisoner to Cocks and Biddulph, the Bankers, at Charing Cross, with an order of the Chepstow Bank for £208.6s.8d drawn in favour of the prosecutors.

On his return to Fleet Street, he said he had lost £205 of the money out of his pocket. Mr.Baco questioned him closely as to the manner of losing it, and he said he received one £200 note, a £5 note, and the rest in cash, and put it all into his waistcost-pocket, until he reached the Stamp Office, where he had to call for some notes for his employers.

While there he took the £205 from his waistcoat, and put it into his pantaloons-pocket, in which there was a hold, but not large enough, as he thought, for the notes to slip through. When he arrived at Temple-Bar, he missed the money from his pantaloons-pocket. He said he had taken down the numbers of the notes, which he gave to Mr.Bacon. His pockets were examined, and a hole, as he had described, found in that of his pantaloons.

Payment was immediately stopped at the Bank of England. On the following day (Saturday the 1st of February) the prisoner was sent out on some ordinary business, and another man, employed to collect money. The prisoner did not return to the house until Monday, and, when questioned as to the cause of his absence, he said he found his employers had withdrawn all confidence from him, and the sooner they parted the better. He behaved with great insolence to Mr.Perkins, and was desired to leave the house; and, in two or three days after, it was discovered that he had quitted his lodgings.

The suspicion, which had been previously excited, that he had embezzled the £205, was increased by this circumstance, but no positive information could be obtained until the10th instant, when the £200 note was offered at the Bank of England, by Mr.Thomas, a dealer in bullion, in Cornhill. The note was stopped, and Mr.Thomas stated, that he had received it from a person who was a stranger to him, but who gave his name and address as, "Reynolds, 217 Hight Street, Shadwell," in payment for some dollars.

Reynolds proved to be a pawn-broker and salesman, and he, on being applied to, said he received the note from a black man, who applied to him to get him 600 dollars, and at the same time purchased gold watches, chains, seals, &c. to the amount of £40. The black man he said, gave his name as James Thompson, and resided at 2 Princes Place, Commercial Road, where he (Reynolds) had waited upon him with the goods.

Taunton, one of the principal Officers of this establishment, went to No.2 Princes Place, and found there an old woman who at first denied all knowledge of a man of colour having been there, but on being conveyed before a Magistrate, and sharply interrogated, she confessed that she knew a man of colour, named Dutcher, who had married her daughter, and that they were gone together into Bedfordshire, but to what town or place she did not know.

Mr.Bacon meanwhile suspecting that the prisoner would make the best of his way to America, his native country, set of for Liverpool, and having given information to Miller the chief police officer there, the prisoner was in custody in less than an hour.

The officer found upon him 134½ Spanish dollars, several gold watches and other property. Mr.Bacon taxed him with the robbery, but he persisted in affirming that he had lost the £205 until Mr.Bacon mentioned some circumstances which had been discovered, and he then confessed his guilt to the fullest extent.

The daughter of the old woman above spoken of was with the prisoner at Liverpool, and Mr.Bacon humanely undertook to pay her expenses back to her friends.

The prisoner was positively sworn to by Mr.Reynolds the pawnbroker, as the man who paid him the £200 not in question. He made no defence and was fully committed to Newgate for trial.

Friday 28 February 1823
Morning Herald (London)

Mr.Moore's Loves of the Angels.
This day are published, in 8vo. price 5s.
Illlustrations of Mr.Moore's "Loves of the Angels." From Designs by R.Westall Esq.; engraved by Mr.Charles Heath.
Printed for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, London.
A few Proofs are taken off in 4to. on French Paper, 10s.6d. on India Paper, 15s. and on India Paper before the lettering, price 20s.
Also may be had,
The Fourth Edition of Mr.Moore's Loves of the Angels. In 8vo. price 9s. boards.

5 March 1823
Charles Heath, 69 Fleet Street, London to Dawson Turner

My dear Sir,
I have the pleasure with this of sending a Proof of the new Note, which I hope you will approve Any alteration by way of addition can be made. It will look better when hardened and cleaned off, which we cannot do in its present state.

With respect to the middle die which you state you have a wish to have entirely confined to your Bank, we will do as much as possible. The price of a large cylinder of Die of this description being more than I should think it worth your while to give. The very great difficulty of engraving them true in tint and hardening without warping necessarily makes them so.

The British Linen Company give us 500 gns for their dies alone besides the usual price and Notes. [sic]. The Royal Bank of Scotland are in treaty with us. The large Belgian Bank have just adopted our plan besides many others since we had the pleasure of seeing you in London. We are making 5 and 10 pound plates for the Norwich Crown Bank. Having very few of the above description of dies we would rather not absolutely part with it. Not that we could refuse you, if insisted on. In that case it would be 100 gns, which I assure you is much less than we should charge anyone else.

It will of course do for all your Notes of whatever Bank you may want them, or you can have it in the usual way and you may rely on its not being used by us for any other Bank in your part of the world.

Your answer respecting the Note will very much oblige us as being very desirous of getting it into circulation as soon as possible.

I am happy to add the steam engine was tried last night for the first time and performs to admiration.

Yours, Dear Sir, Very truly,
Charles Heath

P.S. The engine has been prove by cold water pressure at 4000 lbs to the inch and actually worked by steam at 420 lbs to the inch, or 30 atmospheres. At this time a cog on one of the wheels gave way which stopped its operation for a short time. In a few Days all our machinery will be moved by it.

Friday 7 March 1823
Morning Post

Insolvent Debtors' Court
Thursday, March 6.

Gervas Jackson came up on his petition to be heard, when his discharge was opposed by Mr.Heath on behalf of Mr.James Edward Maddox, on the ground of his having obtained money from him on a bill of exchange, by means of false pretences. - - -

Mr.Commissioner Harris - What are you? Are you an Attorney?

Insolvent- No Sir.

The insolvent went on to state that he expected £1,000/. or £1,200/. from Wallington, but £500/. of it was to go to Mitchell, his partner; but he did not obtain the money solely on these representations, indeed they were not made until the bill in question was due - he was quite sure he did not put them in writing at the time the money was paid.

Mr.Heath, however, produced a document, which proved that fact, which the insolvent acknowledged to be his handwriting.

How many livings had you to dispose of?

Insolent - I cannot explain the nature of my business - I won't tell you.

Commissioner Harris - Then you must go back to prison. We do not feel much regard to these private transactions - they ought not to be treated with much delicacy here. If a creditor was being injured by representations connected with them, they ought to be a subject matter of enquiry. If you will not explain now you must go back to prison, until you will condescend to do so - Let him be remanded.

Remanded for contempt.

Friday 7 March 1823
New Times (London)

Insolvent Debtors' Court,
March 6. Important Case

The following hearing excited intense interest in a crowded Court.

John Webb, 70 years of age, came up to be heard on his petition. His discharge was opposed by Mr.Heath on behalf of three creditors, named Biggs, Rusk and Tingay. The insolvent had not employed Counsel.

Before Mr.Heath entered upon the grounds of his opposition, he addressed the insolvent by way of caution, assuring him that if he did not strictly adhere to truth, he would be indicted for perjury, notwithstanding his age.

The insolvent commenced giving his testimony, but in a manner so equivocal and prevaricating, that the Court felt it their duty to address him in very pointed language.

Mr.Heath resumed his inquiry - The insolvent stated that his son brought several papers to him, which purported to be copies of wills and deeds belonging to the late Mr.Bosanquet, formerly a Director of the East India House. He went to Mr.Biggs, a respectable person in the neighbourhood of Hertford, and borrowed money from him under certain representations which the evidence of that gentleman will fully detail, and by such means procured form him the whole of his property, amounting to upwards to 900/. - - -

By the insolvent's own admission, it appeared that he obtained divers large sums of money from the parties who now opposed him, but his replies were so exceedingly contradictory, that Mr.Heath signified his intention of stopping the inquiry, and then his clients would indict the insolvent for uttering forged wills, or as a swindler.

The Court thought the Learned Counsel had better proceed.

Mr. Heath, to the insolvent - You say that you exhibited copies of wills. Pray whom did you name as the executors?

The insolvent smiled, but made no reply.

Mr.Heath -You may laugh, but I will have an answer. Did you not say that C.Grant Esq. - Mellish Esq. and - Read Esq. acted in that capacity? - I mentioned Mr.Grant, but not the rest, as I remember.

The Court - Are you aware that you are liable to an indictment for perjury and swindling, and also for the higher offence of uttering forged copies of wills?

I.n - I do not recall this swindling. He then went on to state with extreme reluctance facts, which were afterwards proved in evidence; and, although he had several times denied having read a paper to Mr.Biggs, he now admitted the fact.

Mr.Heath - Did you ever deliver a packet, like the one now produced, with seven seals, to Mr.Rusk, and say that it contained Bank-notes to the amount of 10,000/.?

In. - I believe I did not; I think that is my writing on the envelope.

Mr.Heath - What in fact did the parcel contain?

In. - A piece of paper, and Rusk knew it; I will not swear that I did not say it contained 10,000/.; the packet was left by my son with Mr.Rusk; I will not swear but what I left it; the bill of exchange purporting to be signed by J.Bosanquet Esq. for 16,000/.I know nothing about; I don't know whether my son or I gave it to Mr.Rusk; I believe my son put down the number of the notes the packet was said to contain; I signed the parcel, and not my son; I believe my son had 900/. of Mr.Biggs; I took it for him, but he only had a part.

On reference to the schedule, no part of this ill-gotten property was accounted for. - - -

Mr.Heath then addressed the Court, in energetic and feeling language on the consummate villany of the insolvent, and implored the Court to dismiss his petition. He would shortly be arraigned at another bar for a serious offence, to which he had that day added another, which subjected him to transportation and the pillory. The Act was only made for honest debtors, who all deeply abhorred the enormity of the insolvent's offences.

The Commissioners concurred in the sentiments of Mr.Heath, dismissed the insolvent's petition, and ordered him to be sent back to Horsemonger Lane Gaol.

Sunday 6 April 1823
Englishman

Insolvent Debtors' Court
Saturday
Hannah Bartlett came up to be heard on her petition to be discharged, and was opposed by Mr.Cooke on behalf of Mary Ross, a dressmaker, and William Davis, an upholsterer.

The only ground of opposition was, that the insolvent who lived under the protection of a gentleman, had not fully accounted for all her furniture. - - -

It appeared by bills the insolvent produced, that she had paid the dress-maker, by whom she was opposed £239/.and that the sum now due to her was, according to the bill furnished, about £120/. being all for dress supplied to her in two years. The Insolvent accounted for her furniture, by stating, that she sold it at different periods to a gentleman, a friend of her's, who allowed her to use it, up to the time she was arrested. On this point she was strictly examined by the Court, and produced the bills of sale made at the time of selling each parcel of the furniture, and accounted for the money she had received for it, which she had applied to the payment of debts then due.

Mr.Heath addressed the Court for the Insolvent. - He said, either the opposing creditors knew the Insolvent's situation, or they did not; if they did not know who she was, they had given credit without proper caution; and if the did, there could be no doubt there were fully aware of the risk they ran when they gave credit, and had amply indemnified themselves in the prices they charged; and in either case, had no great claim to the protection of the Court.

The Chief Commissioner said the only difficulty the Court had felt respected the disposal of the furniture. There could be no doubt that both the opposing creditors well knew the insolvent's situation; and when the dressmaker had received so much in one year in payment of an account for which she probably could not in a Court of Justice recover one farthing, she had little reason to complain; and there was no reason to suppose that the Upholsterer was not well paid by the large sum he had received for furniture supplied to a person in such circumstances.

The insolvent having satisfactorily accounted for the disposal of her furniture, the produce of which she had applied to the payment of her debts, the Court declared her entitled to her discharge forthwith.

Monday 7 April 1823
Morning Herald (London)
Engravings and Books - by Mr.Christie, at his Great Room, Pall Mall, on Thursday Next, and following day, precisely at One o'clock.

A Valuable and interesting Assemblage of Engravings in Portfolios, including many fine Proofs, by Engravers of the English School, particularly a capital Proof of the Death of Wolfe, by Woollett, before the names, and others by Hall, Heath, Earlom &c. and Boydell's Collection of Prints, 2 vols., folio. Also and Assemblage of fine Drawings by old Masters, chiefly purchased at the sale of the late President of the Royal Academy, Mr.West, by a Collector of taste.
May be viewed two days preceding.

29 April 1823
Charles Heath, London, to Dawson Turner

My Dear Sir,
I have received the Proofs and your very kind letter. Mrs.Turner has really done the engraving far better than I thought it possible considering the means she employs, if I may take the liberty of saying so. I think a few hours work would make it all that is desirable and I will touch a Proof and forward it with a parcel of the continuation of Sicily, Germany etc. all the Coat and Cravat are really beautiful. They are kept so very broad and free from spots.

A very little will make the face equally perfect. You were kind enough to ask for my advice on this subject or I should not make so free.

I take the liberty of enclosing two Bills which if you could favour me by cashing would much oblige me. I fear you will think my very trouble [some] but necessity must be my excuse.

With best respects to yourself, Mrs.Turner and Family, I remain Dear Sir,
Yours most truly obliged,
Charles Heath

Would you be so kind as to say in your next what Bills you have of Rodwell and Martins, I believe you have now only one.

Be pleased to address to Fleet Street.

Tuesday 8 April 1823
Morning Herald (London)

Artists' General Benevolent Society for the Relief of Decayed Artists, their Widows and Orphans.
The Subscribers and Friends of this Institution are respectfully informed that the Ninth Anniversary Dinner will take place in Freemason's Hall on Friday, the 2d of May.
The Right Hon. the Earl of Liverpool K.G. in the Chair.
Stewards
Right Hon. the Lord Chancellor
Right Hon. the Earl of Dartmouth
Major-General Sir W. Grant Kier K.C.B.
Hon. Sampson Eardley

John Allnutt Esq.,
W.Behnes Esq.
F.L.Chantrey Esq. R.A.
John Constable Esq. A.R.A.
James Davis Esq.
S.P.Denning Esq.
C.L.Fox Esq.
Charles Francis Esq.
Joseph Gwilt Esq.
George Harrison Esq.
Charles Heath Esq. - - -- continues.
Dinner on Table at Five o'clock.
Tickets (with Wine included), at 1/.1s. each, may be had of the Stewards; at the Secretary's 65 Upper Charlotte Street, Fitzroy Square; of Mr.Roper, Assistant Secretary, 14 Duke Street, Portland Street; and at the Freemason's Tavern.
John Young, Hon. Sec.

Sunday 11 May 1823
Englishman

Insolvent Debtors' Court.
Captain William Gamage, of the East India and Post-office service, was opposed by Mr.Pollock, for Mr.Tribe, a respectable tailor in Mortimer Street.

It appeared in evidence that the insolvent went and obtained clothes on the representation that he was recommended by Mr.Robert Newton, an historical engraver, a person well known to Mr.Tribe. The articles were supplied, and additional orders executed; but it did not appear that the complainant, in the interregnum from May 1821 to the following February, ever questioned Mr.Newton as to the truth of Captain Gamage's statement.

Mr.Newton deposed that he had long known the Captain as well as Mr.Tribe; but could not recollect that he ever gave him authority to use his name in reference to the latter. He would not swear that he had not given Mr.Gamage a card of Tribe's, with his (witness's) name at the back of it.

Mr.Pollock submitted to the Court that the insolvent had contracted a debt with Mr.Tribe by false representations.

Mr.Heath was at a loss to know on what ground his learned Friend would argue his case. It was generally known that the whole tribe of tailors were generally incautious in giving credit; and, when they found themselves likely to lose, they looked to the origin of the transaction, and attempted to bolster up a case against the party, of whose responsibility they should endeavour to satisfy themselves in the first instance. The gentleman whose cause he was advocating was living in a house of two as respectable attorneys as existed in London, and never made any false representations. He contended that no case had been made out; he would therefore refrain from further remarks.

On reference to the petition, it appeared that the petitioner had failed to state himself in the nautical employ of the Post-office; the Court therefore desired the order for hearing to be dismissed, allowing Captain Gamage to obtain a new order on payment of costs of the present opposition.

Sunday 18 May 1823
Bell's Life in London and Sporting Chronicle

Insolvent Debtors' Court
George Andrews came up, on his amended schedule, to receive the judgment of the Court. It appeared that in the first instance he had concealed two houses from his schedule, built by him and alleged to belong to Mr.Batteriss, a considerable creditor. They being now inserted, Mr.Heath addressed the Court in aggravation, contending that a clear case of concealment had been made out. Remanded for six months within the walls of the prison, for a concealment of property.

Thursday 22 May 1823
Saint James's Chronicle

From Tuesday's London Gazette
Bankruptcy Enlarged.
Bankrupt to surrender in Basinghall Street. G.Brown, New Bond Street, oilman and wine-merchant, May24, June 7, July 1. at eleven. Attorney, Mr.Heath, Temple.

Thursday 22 May 1823
Gore's Liverpool General Advertiser

From the London Gazette - Bankrupts. - - -

George Brown, New Bond Street, Middlesex, oilman and wine-merchant; May 24, June 7, July 1, at eleven, Court of Commissioners of Bankrupts, London: Attorney, Mr.Heath, London

Sunday 1 June 1823
John Bull.

A medal had been voted to the late Mr.Warren, for a discovery touching the engraving upon steel. In consequence of the death of that able artist, this tribute of the Society was bestowed upon his surviving brother.

We are not very ell informed upon the subject, but it appears to us, without meaning to detract from the merit of the late Mr.Warren, that the Society have been completely humbugged (not by Mr.Warren, but themselves) upon this discovery; for, unless we are extremely deceived, the process has been brought to perfection by Messrs Perkins and Fairman, who have established presses and offices in Fleet Street, in partnership with Charles Heath, the celebrated engraver's son, (who by the way is an excellent artist himself); and that for two or three years past innumerable specimens of the art have been circulated all over the kingdom.

We mention this, no to detract from Mr.Warren's merits, but to shew what we consider the lamentable want of knowledge in the Society under discussion.

Monday 2 June 1823
Morning Herald (London)

Westall's Illustrations of Rogers's Poems.
This day is published, price 2s. embellished with an illustration of the Elopement, from Roger's Poems, elegantly engraved by C.Heath, from a painting of R.Westall; Fashionable Riding, and Ball Dresses in colours.
The Fifth Number of the Improved Series of the Lady's Magazine; or Mirror of the Belles-Lettres, Fine Arts, Music, Drama, Fashions, &c., containing, besides the usual variety of interesting articles on various subjects:- - - -
London: Published by S.Robinson, Chapter House Court, Paternoster row; and sold by all Booksellers of the United Kingdom.

Saturday 7 June 1823
Morning Chronicle

Insolvent Debtors' Court.
Mr.John Lomas came up on his petition to be discharged.
Mr.Pollock opposed the application of the insolvent, at the instance of Messrs Harris and Son, for having fraudulently contracted a debt of 119/. It appeared in evidence that the insolvent had been extensively engaged in the drapery business. He had shops in Bristol, Teignmouth, Truro, &c. &c. and had travelled the West of England in his own right. - - -

In his cross-examination by Mr.Heath, who appeared as his advocate, the insolvent stated that he only ordered goods to the amount of 50/.but the parties sent him 70/. more than he ordered.

Mr. Heath observed that the opposing creditors complained of a fraudulent contract, when it appeared that they had forced goods on his client which more than doubled the amount of his order. As to the item of 800/. for travelling expences during four years, he considered it was very moderate.

Mr.Commissioner Harris, in pronouncing judgment, said that at the time the insolvent made the purchase he had no right to give the order even for 50/. worth of goods.

The Court remanded the Petitioner for nine months, during which term he was ordered to be confined within the walls of the prison, without partaking of its rules and privileges.

Friday 18 July 1823
Morning Chronicle

Patronage of the Fine Arts - It is a very general and unfounded complaint that the Fine Arts are not sufficiently patronised. This cannot be asserted for Nollekins. His first work, which made any decided impression on the public was his well-known head of Mr.Fox, sculptured for Catherine, the Empress of Russia.

The repetitions of it are almost innumerable, not only in marble, but in prints of an endless variety of style. The bust of Pitt had at least an equal notoriety and extensive sale. - - - Meanwhile, the head of almost every Senator was to be found in Nollekins' workshop; and although his chisel was less happy in the busts of the fair sex, yet it was scarcely less occupied on them. His whole-length statue of Pitt, now in the Senate-house at Cambridge, was considered to be the consummation of his talents. It is justly very popular because there is a good deal of nature, and a wonderful similitude to the original, in the whole of its composition. Such was the avidity to possess an engraving of it, that a sum little short of 700 guineas was given to Mr.Heath, senior, for its graphic execution; and happy were the subscribers who could get an early proof impression at almost any price! The rage, like most rages, has long subsided; and impressions, which were said to be all appropriated or subscribed for are now floating about the market, for any man's money, and almost at any man's price!

Tuesday 22 July 1823
British Press

Insolvent Debtors' Court
Sarah Aspinall was opposed by Thomas Riley, a linen-draper.

Mr.Heath, for the insolvent, asked the opposing creditor if he had not taken a warrant of attorney from Miss Aspinall, which had been set aside by a rule of court. Riley admitted, after considerable hesitation, that he had received a warrant of attorney, and the clerk here read the rule of court, which proved its having been set aside.

The opposing creditor handed a bill of exchange to the insolvent; and asked her if that signature was not hers. She answered that it was, and that Riley asked her to accept the bill at 40 days after date, and that he would provide for it when it became due. He at the time knew she was of age. The opposing creditor wished to stop any further reply to this question; but the insolvent went on to observe, that during this period he visited her as a most intimate acquaintance. She had never told Riley's sister that she was 24. She was called Caroline, by Madame Vestris, when she lodged with her, and not with a view to defraud. Insolvent had constantly been at places of public amusement with Riley. [After various insinuations previously thrown out as to the intimacy that had subsisted between the insolvent and himself.] - - -

The opposing creditor's examination in chief being concluded, he called out loudly for his witness, Miss Ann Riley, to come forth (those who were to give evidence having been ordered out of Court); but Mr.Heath intimated to Riley that he wished to have a word or two with him before he quitted the witness's box, and the cross-examination proceeded.

He first knew insolvent in 1818; did not it was 1817, The first time she ever came to his shop she purchased some trifling articles and paid for them. Witness was sure that he had never seen Miss Aspinall before the 18th June 1818; she lodged at Queen Street, Golden Square; had been introduced to him by Mrs.Blake. After considerable prevarication, witness said he might have been there with other persons. Had met insolvent at a ball at the Crown and Anchor. He had never known her but as Caroline, until she moved the Court to set aside the warrant of attorney; he believed that he might have known her as Sarah, when she gave the warrant of attorney. [Mr.Heath here observed that the conduct of the witness was most disgraceful, and that he must recollect he was upon his oath.] - - - She had never rode out with him; she might have rode out with him a little bit. When she went to lodge with Mr.Lardner, had heard that insolvent referred to him, but had not seen Mr.Lardner on the subject.

Mr.Heath - Do you believe one word that you have sworn to, or do you think it is credited by the Court?

Witness - I hope so.
In answer to the Court - He might have given her a ride once from her lodgings to the Opera House. - - -

Jane Green, formerly a servant of the insolvent, was asked several questions by Riley, endeavouring to shew fraud and false statements on the part of Miss Aspinall; but Mr.Heath's cross-examination elicited from her that she had quarrelled with her late mistress, who had made a charge against her. The insolvent in her examination by Mr.Heath, deposed to her having been introduced to her opposing creditor by Mrs.Blake, to purchase a pelisse, about the year 1817, and in a few evening afterwards he came to Mrs.Blake's to tea, was very polite to insolvent, offered her tickets for Miss Booth's benefit, took her to the Argyle Rooms, and constantly visited her from that time until about four months since. - - -

Mr.Heath, in support of the insolvent, remarked very pointedly on the whole of Riley's conduct, and said that the perjury he had wished to fasten upon the insolvent, rebounded upon himself, in order to give vent to his rage at being denied that acquaintance which he had been so desirous of, and regarding which he had insinuated so much. He would not labour the point to prove that if one iota of palpable deliberate perjury appeared in any evidence, the whole of it must fall to the ground; and that being granted, what could be thought of that man's testimony, one part of which contradicted the other through the whole of it. He was sure that no jury, or any court in the world, would hang a cat upon such evidence. "And then" (said the leaned counsel) "let us look, for a moment, at the taste which has produced this opposition; but I thank God I have nothing to do with that man's feelings." With regard to the warrant of attorney, it could only be considered as a fraudulent one; and notwithstanding the man glibly told the court he had never seen the insolvent before the 18th of June 1818, one of his invoices proves that he knew her on the 13th, for it is dated on that day. He begged the court to bear in mind that this man was the intimate acquaintance of the insolvent within four months of the present time. he would only trouble the court with one word more, and ask the learned commissioners if they did, or could believe Riley on his oath?

Mr.Commissioner Bowen observed, that the case for the consideration of the court was, whether a fraud had been committed by the insolvent on the person complaining, or whether his conduct had been such as to justify the court in visiting her with punishment? The only part of the evidence the court had security in was Mr.Day's; for no court or jury could imprison an insolvent one hour on such testimony as Riley's. - - -but a more persevering and heartless vindictiveness had never appeared in that court since he had had the honour of a seat on it. The most persecuting hatred had been evinced by Riley throughout the whole of this transaction; and he had given a different colouring from the truth from beginning to end. He never knew a more indecent and unjustifiable opposition that that of this dashing, dancing, Argylll Room frequenting linen-draper of Oxford Road.

The Court ordered the insolvent to be sworn to her schedule, and she was afterwards discharged.

On the clerk of the Court asking which of Miss Aspinall's creditors wished to become her assignee, Riley had the effrontery to offer himself for that purpose; but the Court most indignantly rejected him. Repeated ebullitions of contempt issued from the auditory during the investigation of this case, and the judgment was received by loud clapping of hands. Riley and his sister quitted the Court together, followed by a crowd of hissing and hooting

Saturday 2 August 1823
Public Ledger and Daily Advertiser

James Arrow, a Dissenting Minister, was opposed by Mr.Pollock for Mr.Crown. Insolvent had no property but what he has inserted in his schedule; his wife has property under her father's will, but Insolvent has no control of it.

The Learned Counsel said he opposed for Mr.Crown, but had no wish to prevent his discharge if he had a fair account of this property. The Chief Commissioner said it was the duty of the Court to see that the Insolvent gave up all his property, whether he was opposed or not; and in this case the Insolvent should produce the will and the deeds under which the Insolvent's wife claimed to hold this property not subject to the control of the husband.

The Insolvent said, knowing that he had no interest in this property, he did not come prepared to produce the will and deeds in question.

Mr.Pollock said a creditor named Baggs had got possession of £700/. upon an execution against this very property; now if this sum was refunded and paid into Court for the benefit of the creditors generally, he would not oppose the Insolvent's being discharged.

Mr.Heath said, Mr.Bagg would not object to paying this money into Court for the benefit of the creditors generally. Upon this understanding it was ordered that the Insolvent should be discharged.

Sunday 3 August 1823
Bell's Weekly Messenger

Insolvent Debtors' Court
John Jarrett was opposed by Mr.Heath on behalf of Mr.Kenzie, who had been his attorney on a writ of inquiry on a mandamus for qualifying insolvent to be an elector of the borough of Evesham. A subscription of £17/. had been raised for the insolvent, which he received; but he gave that sum and more money towards defraying the expenses of the trial. A public house kept by the insolvent's mother-in-law, in which he assisted; but he had no property in it.

An advertisement had been put in the Worcester Journal, in which he and his mother-in-law were represented as joint proprietors, but that was one to serve his mother-in-law, on account of the insolvent being so well liked at Evesham, that his name put down as a partner would bring an increase of customers. After the trial, insolvent's wife received a legacy of £50/. His wife's grandmother died lately, but insolvent did not know whether the deceased left her any property, nor did he make any inquiry about it.

It was charged against the insolvent, that besides other concealments of property, he had made no entry in his schedule of money owing him by the churchwardens of Evesham for work done by him as a carpenter, in the church; and now the insolvent stated, that it was his father's who executed the job, and that he merely worked for him as a journey-man.

Mr.Heath submitted, that under all the circumstances, and particularly that of the insolvent not inquiring about the will of his wife's grandmother, there was an evident concealment of property.

The Court directed the insolvent to amend his schedule, by inserting in it any interest he might have under the will of his wife's grandmother, and at the same time made an order for his discharge.

Sunday 3 August 1823
Bell's Weekly Messenger

W.H.C.Sempell was brought up to receive his discharge. The insolvent had been steward to a gentleman of the name of Pickering, on whose behalf he was now opposed, on the ground of his having defalcated in his payments of monies received by him for his employer. In consequence of a reference made to the provisional assignee, for an examination into the state of the books, that officer reported that in his inquiries he had found several in which were entries of timber sold off the estate of Mr.Pickering. - - - The insolvent said he could not produce his books because they had got into the hands of an attorney who refused to give them up.

Mr.Heath, who opposed the insolvent's discharge, said the insolvent might have subpoenaed the attorney, and compelled him to produce the books.

Mr.Cooke, as Counsel for the Insolvent, requested that some time might be allowed him to enable him to produce his books.

This was acceded to by the Court, and the insolvent was ordered to be brought up on a future day.

Wednesday 17 September 1823
Morning Post

Insolvent Debtors' Court
Novel Case.
Jarvis Baker was called as he stood on the list for yesterday, but it was stated that he was dead.

Mr.Pollock - I was to oppose this Insolvent, but I apprehend it is of no use now.

Mr. Commissioner Reynolds - This Insolvent's affairs it would be well to inquire into, rumour having reached the ears of the Court, that when he died a considerable sum of money was found concealed about his person.

Mr.Pollock - The subject of inquiry was to the amount of £700/. therefore his affairs will be strictly looked into.

William Augusts Grobecker was opposed by Mr.Heath for several creditors, but it was arranged between Mr.Heath and the Insolvent's Counsel, Mr.Pollock that as the Insolvent had a salary of upwards of £250/. per annum, he should apply £25/. per annum to the liquidation of his debts. He was then discharged.

Friday 29 August 1823
Globe

Sunday Morning, and The Girl at the Well.
Just published, by Hurst, Robinson, and Co. (Printsellers to the King) 90 Cheapside and 80 Pall Mall
A Pair of Highly-finished Engravings, by Mr. Charles Heath, from the above admired Pictures of M.W.Sharp, and R.Westall R.A.; 10 inches by 14 high. Prints, 15s.; Proofs 25s; and India Paper Proofs, 31s.6d. each.
N.B. A few Proofs are taken before letters, at 2/.2s. each

Saturday 8 November 1823
Charles Heath to Dawson Turner

My Dear Sir,
The Bill of Mr.Hamilton for £226 is due this Day and as it will be returned to you in the course I enclose a Bill which I hope you will oblige me by cashing and taking the amount out - as most of my time is now taken up in engraving on Steel and for our Firm.

As you will see by a Set of Proofs I forward you this evening from Walter Scott Novels and Tales, the reason I could not send you a Bill on some other House. This I trust you will think is as good. I likewise have the pleasure of sending a Proof the [sic] Vandyke which was by mistake omitted with the two from Westall and Sharpe.

I beg to return you my most thanks for the many acts of kindness received at your hands - I am happy to say this is the last bill but one of Mr.Hamiltons and that I have paid all Rodwell and Martins. - They have paid one Dividend of 2/6 in the Pound and pay one more on the 19th of this month and as far as I can learn will certainly in time pay the whole.

With respect to yourself and Family, I remain Dear Sir,

Yours most truly obliged
Charles Heath

Public Ledger and Daily Advertiser
Saturday 8 November 1823

Gill's Hill Cottage.

It may be thought extraordinary, that having been so recently released from prison, Probert, should have been in possession of the Villa at Gill's Hill. In Term time he was usually about town, frequenting different gambling houses, but the history of the cottage is briefly this: - About five years ago George Heath Esq. (the barrister), who had from some years occupied the cottage, disposed of it to Mr Hewart, a Gentleman of respectability, unknown to and wholly unconnected with any of the subsequent occupants. After a short residence there, Mr Hewart dsiposed of it to Holding, in whose possession it remained until occupied by Probert. A private still is said to have been worked on the premises during the occupancy of one of the parties.

The fish pond in which the body of Mr. Weare was first deposited had been made during the occupancy of the premises by Mr Heath who had it dug for the purpose of containing gold and silver fish, for the amusement of his children. It is a long narrow slip, of small dimensions, and so near the cottage, that the feet of Mr Weare were visible from the sitting room.

Saturday 8 November 1823
Public Ledger and Daily Advertiser

Murder of Mr.Weare
Further Particulars.
Every day brings to light some fresh circumstance connected with this horrid transaction, over which there hangs a veil of mystery which must be removed 'ere a true knowledge of the facts can be attained.

The characters of all the parties directly implicated in the murder of Mr.Weare have been long notorious; and it is remarkable that he should have been cautioned against accepting the fatal invitation to visit Gill's Hill Cottage. About ten days before the murder, Mr.Rixworthy, seeing the Thurtell's - whom he well knew - before his door in Spring Gardens, accosted them; and, after some conversation, in the course of which they asked for Mr.Weare, he (Rixworthy) invited them to examine his new billiard room, when shortly after Mr.Weare came in, and going up to John Thurtell, shook him by the hand. - Mr.Rixworthy, supposing them to have business, retired. The parties left the room, Mr.Weare came to Rixworthy, who asked him what the Thurtells wanted; Mr.Weare replied, that Jack Thurtell had invited him to take a few day shooting, in Hertfordshire, at a friend's , whose acquaintance in the neighbourhood would insure them good sport. Mr. Rixworthy said, do you mean to go; you know the Thurtells, and had better not. - Mr.Weare replied, My going into Hertfordshire, under these circumstances, cannot mix up my character; but they are to call again, and Mr.Weare told Mr.Rixworthy the day was fixed. - - -

It may be thought extraordinary, that having been so recently released from prison, Probert should have been in possession of the Villa at Gill's Hill. In Term time he was usually about town, frequenting different gambling houses, but the history of the cottage is briefly this:- About five years ago George Heath esq (the barrister) who had for some years occupied the cottage, disposed of it to Mr.Hewart, a gentleman of respectability, unknown to and wholly unconnected with any of the subsequent occupants. After a short residence there Hewart disposed of it to Holding, in whose possession it remained until occupied by Probert. A private still is said to have been worked on the premises during the occupancy of one of the parties. The fish pond in which the body of Mr.Weare was first deposited had been made during the occupancy of the premises by Mr.Heath, who had it dug for the purpose of containing gold and silver fish, for the amusement of his children. It is a long narrow slip, of small dimensions, and so near the cottage, that the feet of Mr.Weare were visible from the sitting room. - - - -

Friday 14 November 1823
Belfast New Letter
Cheap Books at George Harrison's. 51 High Street. The following are inserted as specimens. - - -
Illustrations of the Lay of the last Minstel, engraved by Heath from designs by Schetsky.4to.boards... £1.2.9.

Saturday 22 November 1823
Morning Herald (London)

Insolvent Debtors' Court.
Friday

Alfred Wapshot was opposed and examined by Mr.Heath. He said he came of age in 1821. When he was an infant, two years old, he had been left a legacy of 1200/.; and when he came of age, his father was in great distress, and the insolvent made him a present of 500/., to enable him to pay his debts. He had not run up any scores in public houses before he was of age; but he had borrowed money of publicans.

His father never had him instructed in writing because he was near-sighted. He had lost 250/. by dealing in cattle. When he was 18 years old, he joined his father in a bond for 260/. which he paid when he became of age. He had not inserted his father's name in a schedule as a debtor for this sum, because it was a part of the 500/. he had made a present of to his father. He never applied to any one to sue his father for the 260/. His father is now gone to the workhouse, and could pay him nothing. His brother did not owe him any money. He had no money secured by way of annuity.

On being examined by his Counsel, Mr.Cooke, the insolvent said he had not a shilling at this time; that he had failed in every thing he had taken in hand; and was now living on the gaol allowance; his wife got her bread by washing. - - -

Witness on being cross-examined by Mr.Cooke, said, he had no great idea of the insolent's capability for doing business, because what he said could not be depended on.

Mr.Heath submitted to the Court whether the insolvent's father should not have been put into the schedule as one of his debtors: for nothing could have been more improbable than that of his making his father a present of 500/., and indeed for such an education as the father had given him, he was not entitled to one shilling. With respect to the transaction of getting the saddle and bridle from Mr.Day, the Learned Counsel contended that it was altogether fraudulent, for which he might have been prosecuted, if Mr.Day had not put down the articles as a debt.

Mr Cooke addressed the Court on behalf of the defendant.

The Chief Commissioner observed, that it was a melancholy thing to see a young man only 23 years of age, after having been left 1200/. in a situation of ruin, such as he now appeared to be in. It was evident that he had committed fraud on Mr.Day by borrowing and never returning his saddle and bridle; and for that he must be confined for three months, within the walls of the prison.

Thursday 27 November 1823
Saint James's Chronicle

This day, handsomely printed in 5 vols.fc. 8vo. with a Portrait, 35s. a new edition of,
The Poems of the Right Hon. Lord Byron.
Another Edition, 4 vols. 8vo. 42s.
The Tragedies to complete the above, may be had separately.
Printed for John Murray, Albermarle Street.
Illustrative Plates by Stothard and Heath, foolscap 8vo. 18s., 8vo., 30s. 4to, proofs, 42s.
Illustrative Plates by Westall and Heath, foolscap 8vo.30s., 8vo. 42s. 4to. proofs, 63s.

Thursday 4 December 1823
Leeds Intelligencer

Splendid and Rare Books
Messrs. Robinson and Hernaman, Booksellers, Leeds, beg leave respectfully to announce that they have just received some valuable Additions to their stock, which they are enabled to offer on the most liberal Terms. Amongst other Choice Articles are the following, including a few fine Specimens from the Collection of William Beckford Esq., late of Fonthill Abbey; George Watson Taylor Esq., M.P.; the Marquis Cornwallis; and Charles Heath Esq., the eminent Engraver.

Monday 8 December 1823
Globe
Handsomely printed, 5 vols. 8vo. 2/.12s.6d.
The Poetical Works of the Rev.George Crabbe. Another Edition in eight vols., foolscap 8vo. 2/.8s.
Printed for John Murray, Albermarle Street.
Thirty-one Plates to illustrate the Poems of Crabbe. Engrave by Heath, from drawings of Westall. 4to. Proofs, 4/.4s. 8vo. 3/. foolscap 8vo. 2/. 2s.

Monday 8 December 1823
Globe

This day, 8vo. 1/. 14s.6d.
Ten Plates, with a Portrait of Washington Irving, to illustrate the Sketch Book, &c. from designs by Leslie A.R.A., engraved by Scriven, Heath, Finden, Warren, &c.
Proofs India (only Twenty-five Copies), 4to. 3/.13s.6d.
Proofs 4t. (Fifty Copies only) 2/.10s.
Printed for John Murray, Albermarle Street

Saturday 13 December 1823
Staffordshire Advertiser

Report - From the Select Committee of the House of Commons on the Recovery of Small Debts. (continued.)

Two experiments have been tried in the county courts of Middlesex and Lancashire, to improve this ancient mode of jurisdiction; barristers preside in each of these.In that of Middlesex, according to the Act which regulates the court, the barrister who is called the county clerk, is empowered to have a voice in the decision of the jury, who decide by a majority of voices; but Mr.Heath, the present county clerk, has informed the Committee, that the invariable practice is for the county clerk to state his opinion as to the law of the case only, and to leave the decision of the fact to the jury, and that he believes the jury are not generally aware that they can do otherwise than come to an unanimous decision.

The jury in this court usually consists of three persons of that class who form the petty juries in the courts of Westminster; and the proceedings are not in writing.

The extent of its jurisdiction is forty shillings. The Committee have not thought it necessary to go into any very particular examination as to whether this court gives satisfaction to the persons who apply to it for redress; as Mr.Heath states, that although he considers it very well calculated for deciding upon causes to the amount of forty shillings, he doubts whether the process be not too summary to be extended to sums of ten pounds.

The regulations which have taken place in the county court of Lancashire, and which have rendered it much more efficient than county courts in general, have been principally owing to the rules of practice in that court, and not to any Act of Parliament.

Mr.Addison, who is retained by the Sheriff to preside in it, has been examined by the Committee; and it appears from his evidence, that the necessity of adopting all the modes of proceeding in the superior courts, renders it an inconvenience and expensive system of trial for Small Debts.
The delay incident to proceedings in the county courts in general, is very much obviated by allowing entries to be made in the intervals between the regular days on which the court sits, at the office of the county clerk, as if they had been entered at the previous sitting of the court.

In causes for sums above forty shillings, here, as well as in all the county courts, a writ of Justicies is necessary to enable the court to act; but from the peculiar circumstances of the Duchy of Lancaster, this writ is issued from the Chancery of the Duchy at a much smaller expense than it can be in ordinary cases.

During the last year, this court had held its sittings occasionally at Manchester, and this change had been productive of very great convenience to the inhabitants of that populous district, without any concommitent disadvantages.

- - - continues - - - long article.

Wednesday 24 December 1823
Sussex and Surrey Chronicle

Insolvent Debtor's Court. Tuesday Dec.18.
Edward Putland was opposed by Mr.Heath for a creditor named James Moore. It appeared that the insolvent had been a coal and timber-merchant at Croydon, and was confined to the King's Bench prison from April 1822 to the following November.

There were three detainers against him amounting to £1,100. In order to obtain his discharge, he gave an acceptance for £30 to a person named Sandom, to be lodged with a Mr.Green as a security, and not to be negotiated unless the discharge could be accomplished.

While this bill was running on, Sandom obtained different sums of money, amounting to £30, under various pretences, and defrauded the insolvent; for which he (insolvent) indicted him at the last Easter Newington Sessions, when he was convicted and sentenced to seven years' transportation.

He had passed the bill to the present creditor, who stated that he gave clothes for it. In consequence of the insolvent's wife having represented to his creditors the conduct observed towards him by Sandom, they sent his discharge to the prison, and he was liberated; but was afterwards arrested by Mr.Moore for the £30. A professional gentleman named Duncombe stated some circumstances respecting Mr.Moore, but was cautioned by the Court to take care how he reflected upon the character of the individual.

Mr.Heath contended that the insolvent had been ancilliary to the fraud practised by Sandom.
The Court observed that there were some services incomplete, and therefore the case should stand over for the present. They intimated their intention, when the insolvent was next brought up, not to allow his discharge to take place for some time longer, for which they would then assign their reasons.

Victoria and Albert Museum
1823

Interesting obituary on the engraver Wm. Sharp.

"His merit began to display itself in the Novelist's Magazine, for which work, published by Harrison in Paternoster Row, he executed some plates from the designs of Stothard. Messrs Heath, Angus and Hall contributed their talents at the same period to the graphic illustrations of this very interesting octavo work. We could name twenty distinguished contemporaries lately living, who, on comparing notes with youngsters, were accustomed to go to Paternoster Row, on the morning of publication and purchase a monthly number of the Novelists Magazine, wet from the press. To those volumes thus published, may be traced the origin of those beautifully illustrated brought out periodically, which have since raised the reputation of the British Press."

1824